First and foremost I believe he has violated his oath by allowing millions of illegal immigrants to come into our country. He has not made it a priority to enforce the laws we have against illegals or the people who hire them. On top of that he has the gall to call the Minutemen vigilantes. What arrogance. Secondly by not vetoing the McCain bill on campaign finance he has gone against the first amendment to our Constitution. Thirdly he is out of control on spending. Lastly the war on terrorism could be handled differently although on this point I will cut him some slack as I know this is a very difficult thing to do and the press and Democrats are hindering him. I do not call for his impeachment lightly but I have simply had enough of his elitism and his wife,s pandering to Hollywood.
First of all, I dont think any of that rises to the level of impeachment. You can argue that somehow he has compromised national security by not building a border fence the second he took office, but I doubt that would really qualify either. Your other points, while valid arguments from a true conservative perspective are not grounds for impeachment.
Furthermore, the president doesnt spend, congress does. The president makes budget recommendations. Certainly conservatives should be concerned about his lack of veto use (none, to this date), but I give 90% of the blame to Congress.
Finally, I would be interested in hearing how the President should have handled the war on terrorism. I would remind you that before you call for extreme measures that I and many military people would probably be in favor of, remember that the left wing faction of this country and congress will never allow for the type of military action that is/was/will be needed to prosecute this war. Having said that, what is your idea? So to blame the president for not carrying out some extreme hypothetical military idea I would ask myself if such idea would ever be carried out by any president.
We will just have to disagree as to whether or not he deserves impeachment but I have to ask why you accuse me of wanting some extreme hypothectical military action.I clearly stated I know he is being hindered by the media and the Democrats. I also know I do not know everything I would like to know to really say what should be done except to say his pitiful explanation about WMD'S and his allowing of court marshals of soldiers just doing there jobs has me very angry and I think it is justified anger. As to the spending part if he does not sign unless they override with super majority then the spending would not happen so I will hold him accountable for his actions. With his performance we may very well be saying President Clinton again.
4 Comments:
Are you going to elaborate at all - or should be just guess as to your reasons?
First and foremost I believe he has violated his oath by allowing millions of illegal immigrants to come into our country. He has not made it a priority to enforce the laws we have against illegals or the people who hire them. On top of that he has the gall to call the Minutemen vigilantes. What arrogance. Secondly by not vetoing the McCain bill on campaign finance he has gone against the first amendment to our Constitution. Thirdly he is out of control on spending. Lastly the war on terrorism could be handled differently although on this point I will cut him some slack as I know this is a very difficult thing to do and the press and Democrats are hindering him. I do not call for his impeachment lightly but I have simply had enough of his elitism and his wife,s pandering to Hollywood.
First of all, I dont think any of that rises to the level of impeachment. You can argue that somehow he has compromised national security by not building a border fence the second he took office, but I doubt that would really qualify either. Your other points, while valid arguments from a true conservative perspective are not grounds for impeachment.
Furthermore, the president doesnt spend, congress does. The president makes budget recommendations. Certainly conservatives should be concerned about his lack of veto use (none, to this date), but I give 90% of the blame to Congress.
Finally, I would be interested in hearing how the President should have handled the war on terrorism. I would remind you that before you call for extreme measures that I and many military people would probably be in favor of, remember that the left wing faction of this country and congress will never allow for the type of military action that is/was/will be needed to prosecute this war. Having said that, what is your idea? So to blame the president for not carrying out some extreme hypothetical military idea I would ask myself if such idea would ever be carried out by any president.
We will just have to disagree as to whether or not he deserves impeachment but I have to ask why you accuse me of wanting some extreme hypothectical military action.I clearly stated I know he is being hindered by the media and the Democrats. I also know I do not know everything I would like to know to really say what should be done except to say his pitiful explanation about WMD'S and his allowing of court marshals of soldiers just doing there jobs has me very angry and I think it is justified anger. As to the spending part if he does not sign unless they override with super majority then the spending would not happen so I will hold him accountable for his actions. With his performance we may very well be saying President Clinton again.
Post a Comment
<< Home